![]() None of this is to say that the MicroBrute doesn’t pack a punch to the contrary, actually. Obviously, only having a single oscillator in theory limits how “massive” you can make the sound, since you aren’t combining multiple different detuned oscillators to create one fat, large sound. What does this mean for the MicroBrute, though? The ever-popular Roland SH-101 used this setup as well, and to great success. The hardware synth uses a single oscillator design, with a multi-waveform setup that allows for the pairing of multiple similarly pitched sawtooth, square and triangle waveforms together. ![]() The main difference, of course, is that the MicroBrute is roughly half the footprint of the MiniBrute, and features two octaves worth of mini keys to accommodate the size reduction. Upon first glance, those familiar with the MiniBrute will immediately recognize several design similarities within the MicroBrute. ![]() The question, of course, is simple: can the MicroBrute live up to the legacy of it’s older brother? Let’s find out.Īnd, to better help you discover the answer to the aforementioned question, please use the guide below to compare the Arturia MicroBrute to a handful of notable competitors that are all available on the market: Now, with the arrival of the MicroBrute, we have more options than ever before from Arturia with respect to hardware synthesizers. ![]() However, with the launch of the MiniBrute in 2012, Arturia took its first triumphant steps out into the wide world of hardware synthesis. This was the company’s bread and butter for a long time, and in many ways, it still is. For many years, Arturia was known as a boutique software company that specialized in creating quality software emulations of both classic and modern synthesizers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |